IS DEVOLUTION FAILING OR IS DEVOLUTION BEING INTENTIONALLY SABOTAGED?

Are the governors digging there own graves? Whats drives the national government so enthusiastic with the performance of the county governments without showing the same enthusiasm towards its own performance? Why are the governors seemingly making the same mistakes ala the finance bill and the numerous taxes all over? Are the taxes really new or are they just getting highlights now. Are the taxes really taxes or charges for services actually rendered? Why did those national government mandarins castigating governors for only spending on recurrent and not development be honest enough to also insist that the Auditor General's Report 2013 was a quarterly progress report for the financial period March -June 2013? That during this time; - All financial transactions and budget priotisation being implemented thus was by the national government through the Transition Authority? -That most of the governors' had not yet even constituted their County Executive Committees? -During the same period, the national government expenditure ratios for recurrent versus development was worse in favour of recurrent? -All governors for the first time took partial control of their expenditures on 1st of June 2013? Again I ask, is the architecture of devolution so intrinsically designed to fail or devolution is being systematically being fought from the national government and other centrists in the civil service? Business community and political stakeholders of all kinds?